Gentry v. Hill
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN (Harry C.), Judge.
Plaintiff offers the following arguments in support of his position:
1. Defendant Precious Hill failed to show that counsel of record lacked the requisite authority to consent to the entry of summary judgment against her.
2. Precious Hill failed to show excusable neglect in that she did not give her defense the attention which a person of ordinary prudence usually gives important business.
3. Precious Hill did not have a meritorious defense.
N.C.R. Civ. P. 60 states in pertinent part:(b) Mistakes; Inadvertence; Excusable Neglect; Newly Discovered Evidence; Fraud, etc. On…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Schloss v. JamisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Howard v. BoyceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- GENERAL AIR CONDITIONING COMPANY v. DouglassSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Bank v. . PenlandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
- Greenhill v. CrabtreeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Gonzalez v. TotalbankDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
- Royal v. HartleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
- Blankenship v. Town and Country Ford, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- Woods v. Billy's AutomotiveCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005