Legal Opinion

Bank v. . Penland

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 21, 1934PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is a motion made by Sallie Hensley to set aside a judgment purporting to have been rendered against her by her consent at January Term, 1930, of the Superior Court of Yancey County. According to the entry on the judgment she was represented by attorneys; but the court found the facts to be that her alleged consent resulted from misinformation imparted to the attorneys by another person and that she did not in fact consent to the judgment or employ attorneys; that she had filed an answer in the cause denying her liability; that she was not represented by authorized counsel at the hearing…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gardiner v. MaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  2. Southern Chemical Co. v. BassSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
  3. Lynch v. . LoftinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Grimsley v. NelsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1996
  2. King v. . KingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  3. Greenhill v. CrabtreeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  4. Cason v. . ShuteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  5. Harrington v. . BuchananSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API