Woods v. Billy's Automotive
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WYNN, Judge.
Under North Carolina law, except in a Small Claims Division action, “a corporation cannot appear and represent itself in proper person or by its officers, but can do so only by an attorney admitted to practice law.” Lexis-Nexis, Div. of Reed Elsevier, Inc. v. Travishan Corp., 155 N.C. App. 205, 207-08, 573 S.E.2d 547, 549 (2002) (citation omitted). Here, Plaintiffs appeal an order vacating a magistrate court’s judgment because the corporation was not properly served as a corporation. We hold that where a corporation being sued in the Small Claims Division is represented at trial,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Clark v. ClarkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- Lexis-Nexis v. Travishan Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- City of Monroe v. NivenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Simms v. MASON'S STORES, INC.(NC-1)Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- Vestal v. Moseley Vending MacHine Exchange, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. SteinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- In re L.H.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
- Dean v. BrunoCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009