Goldy v. Beal
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
NEALON, District Judge.
I. FACTS
The dispute presently before the court concerns post-trial discovery. The plaintiffs have filed a motion to compel the defendants to produce certain documents and to answer designated interrogatories. *452In response, the Commonwealth has sought a protective order.1 The case is in a very unusual procedural posture, because this dispute has arisen years after the official closing of the litigation. A careful review of the facts must precede any decision.
The plaintiffs filed their initial complaint on July 8, 1975. They primarily sought to enjoin enforcement…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. MoitieSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Richard J. Mayberry v. James F. Maroney, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution, Pittsburgh, PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- H. K. Porter Company, Inc., Cross-Appellant v. The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976
- Valerio v. Boise Cascade Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 1978
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Nestle Foods Corp. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1990
- Board of Education v. Admiral Heating & Ventilating, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1984
- United States v. MichiganDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1987
- In Re Estate of NovakovichWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
- United States Ex Rel. Free v. PetersDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1993
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.