Legal Opinion

Goldy v. Beal

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided July 27, 1981No. Civ. No. 75-0791PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

NEALON, District Judge.

I. FACTS

The dispute presently before the court concerns post-trial discovery. The plaintiffs have filed a motion to compel the defendants to produce certain documents and to answer designated interrogatories. *452In response, the Commonwealth has sought a protective order.1 The case is in a very unusual procedural posture, because this dispute has arisen years after the official closing of the litigation. A careful review of the facts must precede any decision.

The plaintiffs filed their initial complaint on July 8, 1975. They primarily sought to enjoin enforcement…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. MoitieSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Richard J. Mayberry v. James F. Maroney, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution, Pittsburgh, PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
  4. H. K. Porter Company, Inc., Cross-Appellant v. The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976
  5. Valerio v. Boise Cascade Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 1978

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Nestle Foods Corp. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1990
  2. Board of Education v. Admiral Heating & Ventilating, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1984
  3. United States v. MichiganDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1987
  4. In Re Estate of NovakovichWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
  5. United States Ex Rel. Free v. PetersDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1993

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API