Legal Opinion
United States Ex Rel. Free v. Peters
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided June 17, 1993No. 89 C 3765PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ASPEN, District Judge:
This court retains jurisdiction over this cause for the limited purpose of either (1) denying respondents’ emergency motion to vacate judgment, or (2) indicating that we are inclined to grant the motion so that respondents may request the Seventh Circuit to remand the matter. See Free v. Peters, Nos. 92-3618 & 92-3711 (7th Cir. Dec. 16, 1992). The gravamen of respondents’ emergency motion, brought pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b), is that statements made by both Kimball Anderson, one of Free’s attorneys, and James Bailinson of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Townsend v. SainSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Keeney v. Tamayo-ReyesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- H. K. Porter Company, Inc., Cross-Appellant v. The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976
- Valerio v. Boise Cascade Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 1978
- Michael Valerio and Yung Hao Chang v. Boise Cascade CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Duhaime v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
- In Re Estate of NovakovichWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
- Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. v. NL IndustriesDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2009
- Midwest Franchise Corp. v. Metromedia Restaurant Group, Inc.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1997
- In Re Wyatt, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.