Stamey v. United States
District Court, W.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
NETERER, District Judge.
Actions by beneficiaries for specific sums on a war risk insurance poliey, alleging necessary facts of total and permanent disability while in service, and death, etc. Defendant answers each complaint, admitting and denying, and *189by affirmative defense stating that $4,000 was converted into ordinary life policy and lapsed for default in premium, payments, and lapse for $6,000 of the policy, reinstatement on representations of physical and mental fitness, and lapse of reinstated policy. Replication is made to each answer that at the time of conversion the insured and the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. CarverSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Hamilton-Brown Shoe Co. v. Wolf Brothers & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Liberty Oil Co. v. Condon National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Magnum Import Co. v. CotySupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Plews v. BurrageCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1921
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Wenzel & Henoch Const. Co. v. Metropolitan Water Dist.District Court, S.D. California · 1937
- Campbell River Mills Co. v. Chicago, M., St. P. & P. R. Co.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1930