Legal Opinion

Wenzel & Henoch Const. Co. v. Metropolitan Water Dist.

District Court, S.D. California

Decided March 24, 1937No. 7883PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

YANKWICH, District Judge.

On March 17, 1933, at Los Angeles, Cal., the plaintiff, Wenzel & Henoch Construction Company, a Wisconsin corporation, qualified to do business in California, to be referred to as “the contractor,” entered into a contract in writing with the defendant, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, a California municipal corporation, to be referred to as “the district,” to do certain work described as the construction of the district’s San Jacinto tunnel in Riverside County, Cal. This diversity of citizenship gives us jurisdiction.

In the performance of the…

2Cases cited62 opinions

  1. Enelow v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Scott v. NeelySupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  3. Martinsburg & Potomac Railroad v. MarchSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  4. Insurance Co. v. BaileySupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  5. United States v. GleasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1900

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Homer v. LorillardMunicipal Court of The Virgin Islands · 1967
  2. Carter Coal Co. v. LitzDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1943
  3. Commonwealth Trust Co. v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1938
  4. Moss v. Calumet Paving Co.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 1962
  5. Universal Surety Co. v. Lescher & Mahoney, Architect & EngineersDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1972

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API