Legal Opinion

People v. Mahoney

California Supreme Court

Decided July 22, 1927No. Docket No. Crim. 3027PublishedCited by 111 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

The appellant, a contractor, and C. B. Bucknall, deputy building inspector of the city of Pasadena, were charged by indictment with manslaughter. The jurors were unable to agree upon a verdict respecting the charges against Bueknall, but returned a verdict of guilty against the appellant. He appeals from the judgment pronounced upon the verdict and from an order denying his motion for a new trial. The charge against the defendant Bueknall was dismissed by the court upon motion of the district attorney.

It has become the custom on New Year’s day of each year to hold a festival of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. MacDonaldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  2. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  3. People v. DerwaeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  4. People v. FrankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  5. People v. MatthaiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902

3Cited by111 opinions

  1. People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. People v. BoyetteCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  3. People v. HendersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  4. People v. FloodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  5. People v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992

106 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API