Commonwealth v. George
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeals, Nos. 235 and 236, Jan. T., 1892, by defendant, Staugliton George, controller of the city of Williamsport, from decrees of O. P. Lycoming Co., Nos. 398 and 399, Dec. T., 1891, awarding peremptory mandamus at the suit of the Commonwealth at the relation of F. H. Keller, mayor, et al., and at the suit of the Commonwealth at the relation of John Jacoby.
Read the full summary
Appeals, Nos. 235 and 236, Jan. T., 1892, by defendant, Staugliton George, controller of the city of Williamsport, from decrees of O. P. Lycoming Co., Nos. 398 and 399, Dec. T., 1891, awarding peremptory mandamus at the suit of the Commonwealth at the relation of F. H. Keller, mayor, et al., and at the suit of the Commonwealth at the relation of John Jacoby. Petitions, the one by the mayor and councils of the city of Williamsport, and the other by John Jacoby, contractor, each praying for a mandamus against the city controller. The petitions set forth that an appropriation of 130,000 was duly…
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
The judgment is affirmed upon the opinion of the learned judge below.
*471Com. ex eel. Jacoby v. George, Appellant.
Pee Curiam,
April 18, 1892:
The judgment is affirmed upon the opinion of the learned judge below.
2Cited by19 opinions
- Commonwealth ex rel. Century Co. v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
- Liverpool & London & Globe Ins. v. ClunieU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California · 1898
- Douglas v. McLeanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
- Commonwealth v. TiceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
- Nicely v. RakerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.