Legal Opinion

Palmer's Appeal

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 6, 1932No. Appeal, 5PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Schaefer,

The question to be disposed of on this appeal is whether the department of internal affairs properly approved proceedings for the issuance of bonds of the County of Allegheny, where the objections to their approval relate to errors in the election proceedings authorizing the incurring of the indebtedness, which errors have been cured by a subsequent validating act (Act of March 21, 1929, P. L. 50). The Court of Common Pleas of Dauphin County determined that the department properly approved the bonds. We conclude likewise.

The proceedings arise under a petition of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. City of Trenton v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. Smith v. . the PeopleNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  3. City of Worcester v. Worcester Consolidated Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1905
  4. White v. City of MeadvilleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
  5. Clark v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1858

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Cumberland Valley Savings & Loan Ass'n v. MyersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  2. Harbold v. ReadingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  3. Schenley Farms Co. v. Allegheny CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  4. Schenley Farms Co. v. McGovernSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  5. Preferential Treatment of War Veterans, Pennsylvania Department of Justice1940

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API