Legal Opinion

Midler v. Benjamin

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided June 6, 2006No. AC 26121PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PETERS, J.

A physician may be held responsible for an unfortunate medical outcome either for failure to comply with the prevailing professional standard of medical care or for failure to obtain informed consent. See Godwin v. Danbury Eye Physicians & Surgeons, P.C., 254 Conn. 131, 757 A.2d 516 (2000). This appeal concerns the law of informed consent. The plaintiffs’ principal claim is that the trial court improperly precluded the minor patient and her parents from testifying about what they would have done if the defendant physician had told them that performance of the chin implant…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kalams v. GiacchettoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
  2. Godwin v. Danbury Eye Physicians & Surgeons, P.C.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
  3. DiLieto v. County Obstetrics & Gynecology Group, P.C.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
  4. Burns v. HansonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
  5. DeGennaro v. TandonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Terio v. RamaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API