Legal Opinion
DiLieto v. County Obstetrics & Gynecology Group, P.C.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 29, 2003No. SC 16698PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
VERTEFEUILLE, J.
The dispositive issue in this appeal is whether the trial court improperly interpreted General Statutes § 52-184c to require the exclusion of the testimony of an expert witness proffered by the plaintiff trustee in bankruptcy, Michael J. Daly.1 The plaintiff appeals from the judgment of the trial court in favor of the defendants Yale University School of *82Medicine (Yale) and Thomas P. Anderson, a physician, after a jury trial in this medical malpractice action.2
On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the trial court improperly: (1) determined that the plaintiff was not…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Parsons v. United Technologies Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- State v. CourchesneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Santopietro v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Frillici v. Town of WestportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Bender v. BenderSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Boone v. William W. Backus HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Grady v. Town of SomersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Rizzuto v. Davidson Ladders, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Lagassey v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Bennett v. New Milford Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.