Legal Opinion
In Re Marriage of Flockhart
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 18, 1981No. Civ. 50761PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WHITE, P. J.
Chenette L. Flockhart (petitioner below) appeals from a portion of an interlocutory judgment of dissolution of marriage. At issue is a benefit payable to respondent Charles G. Flockhart pursuant to Public Law No. 95-250 (enacted Mar. 27, 1978 and designated as the Redwood Employee Protection Program, hereafter Act or REPP). The judgment declared it to be the separate property of respondent. The benefit in question is one which REPP refers to as a “weekly layoff benefit.” (§ 207.)
The trial court found that the benefit was respondent’s separate property. We agree.
On March 27,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hisquierdo v. HisquierdoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- In Re Marriage of BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- In Re Marriage of FithianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Brown v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- In Re Marriage of StenquistCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- In Re Marriage of HugCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- In Re Marriage of LehmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- In Re Marriage of KuzmiakCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- In Re Marriage of HornCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- In Re Marriage of WrightCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.