Legal Opinion

In Re Marriage of Wright

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 25, 1983No. Civ. 5500PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ANDREEN, J.

The parties to this appeal were husband and wife. They entered into a property settlement agreement which neither discussed nor disposed of a sum of money paid to husband as severance pay. Wife instituted a proceeding under section 473 of the Code of Civil Procedure to obtain one-half of the amount paid. She prevailed in the trial court and husband appeals. Even if this had been a separate action, the dissolution proceeding would not have been res judicata. (Miller v. Miller (1981) 117 Cal.App.3d 366 [172 Cal.Rptr. 745].)

The primary question raised by this appeal is whether…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Brown v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. In Re Marriage of StenquistCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  4. In Re Marriage of JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  5. In Re Marriage of SkadenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of LehmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  2. In Re Marriage of KuzmiakCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  3. In Re Marriage of HornCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  4. In Re the Marriage of LawsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  5. In Re the Marriage of BishopCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1986

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API