In Re Marriage of Wright
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ANDREEN, J.
The parties to this appeal were husband and wife. They entered into a property settlement agreement which neither discussed nor disposed of a sum of money paid to husband as severance pay. Wife instituted a proceeding under section 473 of the Code of Civil Procedure to obtain one-half of the amount paid. She prevailed in the trial court and husband appeals. Even if this had been a separate action, the dissolution proceeding would not have been res judicata. (Miller v. Miller (1981) 117 Cal.App.3d 366 [172 Cal.Rptr. 745].)
The primary question raised by this appeal is whether…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- In Re Marriage of BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Brown v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- In Re Marriage of StenquistCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- In Re Marriage of JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- In Re Marriage of SkadenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- In Re Marriage of LehmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- In Re Marriage of KuzmiakCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- In Re Marriage of HornCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- In Re the Marriage of LawsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- In Re the Marriage of BishopCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1986
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.