Legal Opinion

City of Belfield v. Kilkenny

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 22, 2007No. 20060176PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SANDSTROM, Justice.

[¶ 1] Frederick Kilkenny appeals the district court judgment finding him guilty of violating a Belfield city ordinance that prohibits a nuisance in the form of excessive, continuous, or untimely dog barking. Concluding that the ordinance provides minimum guidelines for the reasonable police officer, judge, or jury charged with its enforcement and provides a reasonable person with adequate and fair warning of the prohibited conduct, we affirm.

I

[¶ 2] The municipal court found Kilken-ny guilty, and he appealed to the district court. At the district court trial, a neighbor…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Teigen v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  2. State v. BrownNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  3. In Re Estate of ElkenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  4. City of Fargo v. SalsmanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  5. State v. FIFTEEN IMPOUNDED CATSSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API