Mann Design Ltd. v. Bounce, Inc.
District Court, D. Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
KYLE, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
In this patent action involving pet toys, the parties are currently disputing whether issues of the validity, enforceability and infringement of several patents are more properly litigated here or in Colorado. Plaintiff Mann Design Ltd. (“Mann”) is a Minnesota corporation. Defendant Bounce, Inc. (“Bounce”) is a Colorado corporation. Presently before the Court is Bounce’s motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, to stay the above captioned action. Together with that motion, Bounce has filed an Amended Statement of Non-Liability. For…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Genentech, Inc. v. Eli Lilly and Company, and the Regents of the University of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- Super Sack Manufacturing Corporation v. Chase Packaging CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Jervis B. Webb Company v. Southern Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Spectronics Corporation v. H.B. Fuller Company, Inc., and H.B. Fuller Automotive Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Cosden Oil & Chemical Co. v. Foster Grant Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1977
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Barnes & Noble, Inc. v. LSI CORP.District Court, N.D. California · 2011
- Anza Technology, Inc. v. Mushkin, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
- Ramsey Group, Inc. v. EGS International, Inc.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2002
- PerfectVision Manufacturing, Inc. v. PPC Broadband, Inc.District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2013
- Frontier Communications CorporationUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2022