Legal Opinion

Genentech, Inc. v. Eli Lilly and Company, and the Regents of the University of California

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided September 23, 1993No. 91-1249PublishedCited by 187 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PAULINE NEWMAN, Circuit Judge.

Genentech, Inc. appeals the judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana 1 dismissing, as to the Regents of the University of California (“the University”), the declaratory judgment action brought by Genentech against the . University and Eli Lilly and Company (“Lilly”). We affirm in part, vacate in part and remand for further proceedings.

This is one of several lawsuits filed in the federal courts of Indiana and California involving these parties, 2 relating to recombinant DNA technology as used for the production of human…

2Cases cited69 opinions

  1. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  4. Steffel v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Maryland Casualty Co. v. Pacific Coal & Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by187 opinions

  1. Regents of University of California v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Research Automation, Inc. v. Schrader-Bridgeport International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
  3. Vivid Technologies, Inc. v. American Science & Engineering, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
  4. SanDisk Corp. v. STMicroelectronics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
  5. Merial Ltd. v. Cipla Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012

182 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API