Spectronics Corporation v. H.B. Fuller Company, Inc., and H.B. Fuller Automotive Products, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
CLEVENGER, Circuit Judge.
Spectronics Corporation (Spectronics) appeals the judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York dismissing its action under the Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2201 (1988), against H.B. Fuller Company, Inc., and H.B. Fuller Automotive Products, Inc., (collectively Fuller), for lack of an actual controversy. We affirm.
I
Spectronics manufactures and sells DY-GLO-12, a fluorescent leak detection additive used in automotive air conditioning systems. United States Patent No. 4,758,-366 (the ’366 patent), assigned to Fuller, claims…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Steffel v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. Pacific Coal & Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- United States v. Munsingwear, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- North Carolina v. RiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by103 opinions
- Glaxo, Inc., and Glaxo Group Limited v. Novopharm, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- Raymond Keith Foster, Keith Mfg. Co., and Keith Sales, Co. v. Hallco Manufacturing Co., Inc., and Olof A. HallstromCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Fina Oil and Chemical Co. And Fina Technology, Inc. v. John A. Ewen v. Abbas Razavi, Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- Super Sack Manufacturing Corporation v. Chase Packaging CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Bic Leisure Products, Inc., and Windglider Fred Ostermann, Gmbh v. Windsurfing International, Inc., Defendant/cross-Appellant, and James R. DrakeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
98 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.