Legal Opinion

Harrison v. . Darden

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 22, 1943PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDevin, J.

Tbe judgments appealed from were based upon tbe findings of fact made by tbe referee, concurred in and approved by tbe trial judge. Tbe reference having been by consent, it is tbe established rule in tbis jurisdiction that tbe findings of tbe referee approved by tbe judge are conclusive upon appeal if there was competent evidence to support tbe findings. Wallace v. Benner, 200 N. C., 124, 156 S. E., 795; Usry v. Suit, 91 N. C., 406. Appellant has not brought up tbe evidence beard by tbe referee, nor has be pointed out any material fact not supported by evidence. However, tbe plaintiff assigns…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wallace v. . BennerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  2. Usry v. . SuitSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884
  3. Pritchard v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
  4. Caldwell v. . RobinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
  5. Barrett v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Beacon Homes, Inc. v. HoltSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  2. Board of Com'rs of Roxboro v. BumpassSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  3. Jenkins v. Richmond CountyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
  4. Edwards v. EdwardsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API