Jenkins v. Richmond County
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ARNOLD, Judge.
First we review defendants’ cross-assignment of error that the trial judge erroneously failed to grant their motion for directed verdict made at the conclusion of plaintiffs’ evidence. Defendants argue that the evidence establishes Richmond County complied with the in rem foreclosure statute and that this issue was improperly submitted to the jury.
The deed through which plaintiffs were conveyed the disputed lot lists the names of Peggy Johnson, Ruby Baskerville, Emma Clemons along with Wimphrey Jenkins. G.S. § 105-375(c) provides in part:
A notice stating that the judgment will…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- City of Monroe v. NivenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Powell v. . TurpinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
- Board of Com'rs of Roxboro v. BumpassSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- Henderson County v. OsteenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- In re A.B.D.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
- United States v. WhedbeeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
- Inland Greens HOA, Inc. v. Dallas Harris Real Estate-Construction Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
- Hardy v. Moore CountyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
- Hardy v. Moore CountyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.