Legal Opinion

Board of Com'rs of Roxboro v. Bumpass

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 30, 1953No. 746PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBaeNhill, J.

Tbe interpleader John D. Clay has no interest in tbe claim filed by Dee A. Clay, and Dee A. Clay has no interest in tbe claim of bis cointervener except such as may arise out of some warranty in bis deed of conveyance. Even so, tbe demurrer for that there is a misjoinder of parties and causes cannot be sustained. Tbis, for tbe simple reason tbe statute under which tbe interveners must proceed, General Statutes Cb. 1, Art. 30, requires that a claim for betterments be filed in tbe action in which judgment for land has been rendered. Proper pleading would require each group of interveners to…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Albea v. GriffinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1838
  2. Wharton v. . MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
  3. Wood v. Tinsley.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  4. Merritt v. . ScottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1879
  5. Pritchard v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Beacon Homes, Inc. v. HoltSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  2. Watkins v. WatkinsIdaho Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Shaver v. ShaverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  4. Jenkins v. Richmond CountyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
  5. Clontz v. ClontzCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API