Legal Opinion

State v. Hughey

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 2007No. 29,344PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MAES, Justice.

{1} This matter is before this Court on the State’s interlocutory appeal from the trial court’s exclusion of evidence. See NMSA 1978, § 39-3-3(B)(2) (1972) (allowing appeals from a decision or order suppressing or excluding evidence). In this case, we review the decision of the trial court to grant Defendant’s pretrial request to exclude the results of her blood alcohol content (BAC) test, administered four hours after Defendant collided with another motorist. Because we find the trial court made factual findings that should have been reserved for the jury and improperly…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. State v. AlbericoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State v. AlbericoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1993
  4. State v. TorresNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1999
  5. United States v. Ruben Alfonso and Feli GomezCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. State v. DowneyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2008
  2. State v. MarquezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2009
  3. State v. GodoyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2012
  4. Madrid v. Brinker Rest. Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2015
  5. State v. LaPIETRANew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2009

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API