Keesecker v. G. M. McKelvey Co.
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtZimmerman, J.
Since this cause is now here on its merits, the first and most important question engaging our attention is whether the defendant’s employee was a licensee or trespasser as a matter of law, or whether his status is a mixed question of law and fact and should be left to the determination of a jury under instructions from the court.
A “trespasser” may be defined as one who unauthorizedly goes upon the private premises of another without invitation or inducement, express or implied, but purely for bis own purposes or convenience; and where no mutuality of interest exists between him and the owner…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Schock v. Ringling Bros. Etc.Washington Supreme Court · 1940
- Connell v. Keokuk Electric Railway & Power Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1906
- Heller v. New York, N. H. & H. R.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1920
- Foley v. H. F. Farnham Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1936
- Lewis v. Schooner ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1843
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Jeffers v. OlexoOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- Kopka v. Bell Telephone Co. of Pa.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
- Chance v. BP Chemicals, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
- Connelly v. BalkwillDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1959
- Kramer v. Angel's Path, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.