Legal Opinion
Connelly v. Balkwill
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided April 8, 1959No. Civ. A. in Equity 31717PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McNAMEE, District Judge.
Defendants’ motion for summary judgment is based upon the contention that this action is barred upon one or more of the following grounds: (1) the statute of limitations; (2) res judicata; and (3) collateral estoppel.
As indicated by the second and third grounds of the motion, this is the second action growing out of the same transaction. The first action was commenced in the Common Pleas Court of Lake County, Ohio, in November 1950 against the defendants George W. Balkwill and the GEN Corporation and resulted in a judgment for the defendants which upon a trial de novo…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Holmberg v. ArmbrechtSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Bernhard v. Bank of America National Trust & Saving AssociationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Emich Motors Corp. v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- United States v. International Building Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Perry O. Hooper, as Trustee in Bankruptcy of Consolidated American Industries, Inc. v. Mountain States Securities CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1960
- List v. Fashion Park, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
- Trussell v. United Underwriters, Ltd.District Court, D. Colorado · 1964
- Blon v. Bank One, Akron, N.A.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
- List v. Fashion Park, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.