Legal Opinion
Bama Tomato Co. v. United States Department of Agriculture
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided May 29, 1997No. 95-6778PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BIRCH, Circuit Judge:
In this appeal from a decision and order of the Secretary of Agriculture, we decide three issues related to the employment bar provision of the Perishable Agricultural Commodities Act, 1930, 7 U.S.C. § 499h(b): (1) whether the employment bar provision is unconstitutionally vague and overbroad; (2) whether a licensed employer can challenge a previous determination that an employee is barred from employment by a licensee; and (3) whether a thirty-day suspension of the employer’s license was legally warranted and factually justified. The Secretary, through a judicial…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- United States v. HuntCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
- United States v. McGarityCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2012
- United States v. WayerskiCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
- United States v. Morgan Chase WoodsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2012
- United States v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.