Legal Opinion
United States v. Hunt
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided May 5, 2008No. 06-16641PublishedCited by 278 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BLACK, Circuit Judge:
Following a jury trial, Jason Hardy Hunt was convicted under 18 U.S.C. § 1519 for knowingly making a false entry into a police incident report with the intent to impede, obstruct, or influence an FBI investigation. Hunt raises three issues on appeal. First, he says § 1519 is constitutionally wanting because it did not put him on fair notice his behavior was proscribed. Second, he asserts the evidence was insufficient to convict him. Third, he says his ten-month sentence is unreasonable. Each of these arguments fail; therefore, we affirm his conviction and sentence.
I.…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- United States v. John Kevin TalleyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
- United States v. PughCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by278 opinions
- Yates v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- United States v. Anthony RobertsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2015
- United States v. Edgar Jamal GamoryCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
- United States v. Alfaro-MoncadaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
- United States v. Francisco CuberoCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2014
273 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.