Legal Opinion

United States v. Wayerski

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided October 26, 2010No. 19-13277PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REAVLEY, Circuit Judge:

In this consolidated appeal, Erik Wayerski, Raymond Roy, John Mosman, and Stepan Bondarenko appeal their convictions and sentences for engaging in multiple child-pornography offenses. All four co-defendants were convicted of engaging in a child exploitation enterprise, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252A(g); conspiring to advertise, transport, receive, and possess child pornography and to obstruct justice, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 371, 1512(k), 2251(d)(1) and (e), and 2252A(a)(l) and (b)(1); and advertising the exchange of child pornography, in violation of 18 U.S.C.…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Parker v. LevySupreme Court of the United States · 1974

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. United States v. Francisco CuberoCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2014
  2. United States v. McGarityCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2012
  3. United States v. LebowitzCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2012
  4. United States v. Glen Sterling CarpenterCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2015
  5. United States v. Morgan Chase WoodsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2012

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API