Legal Opinion

United States v. Williams

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided April 6, 2006No. 04-15128PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REAVLEY, Circuit Judge:

Michael Williams appeals his conviction for promotion of child pornography under 18 U.S.C. § 2252A(a)(3)(B) on the grounds of facial unconstitutionality. For this reason, we reverse that conviction. Williams was also convicted of possession of child pornography under 18 U.S.C. § 2252A(a)(5)(B), and he appeals his sentence for that offense on the grounds that the court unconstitutionally enhanced his sentence under a mandatory guidelines scheme in violation of United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005). Because there was no reversible…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. United States v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  2. United States v. PughCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
  3. State v. BahlWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  4. State v. BahlWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  5. State v. ValenciaWashington Supreme Court · 2010

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API