Commonwealth, Department of Highways v. Thomas
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
1Opinion of the Court
EDWARD P. HILL, Judge.
In this case the novel question is presented concerning the right of riparian or littoral landowners to recover for the destruction or impairment of their access to Barkley Lake by reason of the construction by appellant of a roadway, also by a fill across an inlet bordering on the landowners’ property. The courts of the states are about equally divided in interpreting the law on this question.
*214The judgment appealed from awarded appellees $18,000 damages, from which only the Commonwealth appeals. The award of the county court commissioners was $7500.
Appellees own an…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. Virginia Electric & Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- United States v. River Rouge Improvement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- United States v. RandsSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Gray v. Reclamation District No. 1500California Supreme Court · 1917
- Webb v. GiddensSupreme Court of Florida · 1955
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Morgan v. ScottKentucky Supreme Court · 2009
- Wernberg v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1973
- Reed v. ReedCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1970
- Center Townhouse Corp. v. City of MishawakaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
- Pierson v. CoffeyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1985
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.