Legal Opinion

In Re Keough

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 20, 1949No. 31617PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStewart, J.

Was Gebauer entitled to the records •demanded or to have the information therein made available to him?

Again the question is before us whether a person •subpoenaed to give testimony in a deposition before a notary public may refuse to answer questions on the ground that the information sought is incompetent, immaterial, irrelevant or privileged.

In the case of In re Hyde, 149 Ohio St., 407, 79 N. E. (2d), 224, we reviewed the decisions of this court with reference to questions similar to those involved here and showed how, like Banquo’s ghost, they had been periodically rising during the past…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re Martin, Jr.Ohio Supreme Court · 1943
  2. In Re HydeOhio Supreme Court · 1948
  3. In Re Martin, Jr.Ohio Supreme Court · 1942

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Burnham v. Cleveland Clinic (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Brookshire v. Pennsylvania R. Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1953
  3. In Re FryeOhio Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Ruppert v. RepperCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1962
  5. In Re ShoupOhio Supreme Court · 1950

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API