Legal Opinion

In Re Hyde

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 21, 1948No. 31169PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStewart, J.

The question whether a witness subpoenaed to give testimony in the taking of a deposition before a notary public may refuse to answer questions, on the ground that the information sought to be elicited is incompetent, immaterial and irrelevant or that such information is privileged, has had an adventurous' career through the courts.

Section 11503, General Code, provides:

“A subpoena shall be directed to a person named therein, and require him to attend at a specified time and place to testify as a witness. It also may direct the person it names, to bring with him any book, writing, or other…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re Martin, Jr.Ohio Supreme Court · 1943
  2. In Re Martin, Jr.Ohio Supreme Court · 1942

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Radiant Burners, Inc., an Illinois Corporation v. American Gas Association, Peoples Gas Light and Coke CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1963
  2. Burnham v. Cleveland Clinic (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Brookshire v. Pennsylvania R. Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1953
  4. In Re KeoughOhio Supreme Court · 1949
  5. In Re FryeOhio Supreme Court · 1951

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API