Legal Opinion
Wagenheim v. Alexander Grant & Co.
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided December 15, 1983No. 82AP-1039 and -1040PublishedCited by 54 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtStrausbaugh, J.
The defendant, Alexander Grant & Company, brings this appeal from the trial court’s denial of its motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and/or new trial, in favor of both plaintiffs, Consolidata Services, Inc., and Joel Wagenheim. The cases of Joel Wagenheim v. Alexander Grant & Company (case No. 82AP-1039) and Consolidata Services, Inc. v. Alexander Grant & Company (case No. 82AP-1040) were consolidated for trial and tried to a jury on September 22, 1981.
Consolidata Services, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as “CDS”), was established in Ohio in 1970 by plaintiff Joel S. Wagenheim and…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Schade v. Carnegie Body Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1982
- Columbus Finance, Inc. v. HowardOhio Supreme Court · 1975
- Leichtamer v. American Motors Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1981
- Haddon View Investment Co. v. CoopersOhio Supreme Court · 1982
- Richfield Bank & Trust Co. v. SjogrenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Becker v. Lake County Memorial Hospital WestOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- Wozniak v. WozniakOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
- Lively v. RufusWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2000
- Telecom Acquisition Corp. I, Inc. v. Lucic Ents., Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2016
- Henderson v. Spring Run AllotmentOhio Court of Appeals · 1994
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.