Legal Opinion

Rezapour v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 10, 1990No. 6-89-073-CRPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRANT, Justice.

Kamran Rezapour appeals from his conviction for the offense of illegal investment. Upon finding Rezapour guilty, the jury assessed punishment at thirty years confinement and an $80,000 fine.

On appeal, Rezapour contends that the evidence is insufficient to support the verdict and that the charge delivered to the jury was improper.

Rezapour and his co-defendant, Kevin Oglesby, attempted to purchase cocaine from a Federal Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) agent and a Houston police officer. Rezapour had been acquainted with one of these undercover officers for some time, and he…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Almanza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  2. Zant v. StephensSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Stromberg v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  4. Mills v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Butler v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Jordan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  2. Lopez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1991
  3. Rezapour v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  4. Estrada v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1991
  5. Jordan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API