Legal Opinion

Staley v. O'Day

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 26, 1913No. Civ. No. 1261PublishedCited by 9 opinions

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco vacating a default judgment. Frank J. Murasky, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. James A. Bacigalupi, and Harry G. McKannay, for Appellant.

1Opinion of the CourtKerrigan, J.

This is an appeal by plaintiff from an order vacating and setting aside a judgment by default entered against the defendant.

The action is for three thousand dollars, a balance claimed to be due from the defendant to one Harry G. McKannay, the assignor of the plaintiff, for services rendered in the capacity of attorney at law. The action was commenced on December 9, 1910; and some time in the latter part of the following February the defendant had obtained from the court by various orders all the time to answer which the court, under the provisions of section 1054 of the Code of Civil…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. O'Brien v. LeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Banta v. SillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Nicoll v. WeldonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Douglass v. ToddCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Merchants' Ad-Sign Co. v. Los Angeles Bill Posting Co.California Supreme Court · 1900

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Waite v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Brooks v. NelsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  3. Bonfilio v. GangerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  4. Dunn v. Standard Accident InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  5. Carbondale Machine Co. v. EyraudCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API