Legal Opinion
Cognex Corp. v. Microscan Systems, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 31, 2013No. 13 Civ.2027(JSR)PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ORDER
JED S. RAKOFF, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Cognex Corporation and Cognex Technology & Investment, LLC (collectively, “Cognex”) sue defendants Microscan Systems, Inc. and The Code Corporation for patent infringement. Cognex alleges that Microscan’s Mobile Hawk Direct Part Mark Reader product, which is designed and sold by the defendants, infringes U.S. Patent No. 7,874,-487 (the “'487 patent”). As a result of plaintiffs’ decisions to drop certain claims and the Court’s September 30, 2013, 2013 WL 5550092, Order granting defendants partial summary judgment as to claims 23, 28, and…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Microsoft Corp. v. i4i Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Richard Morales v. Quintel Entertainment, Inc. And Peter StolzCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Residential Funding Corporation v. Degeorge Financial Corp., Degeorge Home Alliance, Inc. And Degeorge Capital CorpCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- Therasense, Inc. v. Becton, Dickinson and Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- Exergen Corp. v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- De Sesto v. SlaineDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2016
- Radiancy, Inc. v. Viatek Consumer Products Group, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Tardif v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Lumetrics, Inc. v. Bristol Instruments, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 2015
- United States ex rel. Takemoto v. Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 2016
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.