Legal Opinion

Rand v. Collins

California Supreme Court

Decided October 26, 1931No. Docket No. S.F. 14445PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWaste, C. J.

The respondent, as registrar of voters, has refused to accept and file declarations of candidacy tendered by the petitioners for the offices of auditor, coroner and county clerk, respectively, to be voted on at the election to be held in the city and county of San Francisco on November 3, 1931. Respondent’s refusal was based on his contention that, under the provisions of a new freeholders’ charter adopted by the people of San Francisco on March 26, 1931, ratified by the legislature, and, except in certain particulars, in effect January 8, 1932, (Assembly Concurrent Resolution No. 26, Stats.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Coulter v. PoolCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Fragley v. PhelanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Kahn v. SutroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Martin v. Board of Election CommissionersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  5. People v. ElkusCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. City of Pasadena v. CharlevilleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  2. District Election of Supervisors Committee v. O'ConnorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  3. Murphy v. City of PiedmontCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  4. Galli v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  5. Sharpe v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API