Legal Opinion

Rea v. Kelley

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 10, 1931No. 27,747PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDibell, J.

Action to cancel a mortgage upon real property. The property was owned by the plaintiff and was registered in his name under the Torrens statute. The mortgage was made by the plaintiff to the Staring Company, a corporation of Minneapolis, and by the company assigned to the defendant. The claim of the plaintiff is that payment was made to the mortgagee. The payment if made was made after the assignment and its entry as a memorial upon the Torrens certificate of title and without actual notice by the mortgagor of the assignment. There were findings for the defendant. ■ The plaintiff appeals…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Douglas v. WestfallSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
  2. Baart v. MartinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  3. In Re Application of JuranSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  4. Riley v. PearsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
  5. Lewis v. BuckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1862

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Carl v. DetoffolSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
  2. Chamberlin v. Twin Ports Development Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
  3. Armstrong v. LallySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API