Legal Opinion
Simanski ex rel. Simanski v. Secretary of Health & Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided December 15, 2010No. 03-103VPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
CHRISTINE O.C. MILLER, Judge.
This ease, before the court after argument and supplemental briefing on petitioners’ motion for review of the special master’s order of dismissal, continues the judicial examination of the nature and extent of adversarial proceedings that Congress contemplated under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-l-300aa-34 (2006) (the “Vaccine Act”). The special master ruled on the sufficiency of petitioners’ expert medical opinions in a show-cause order and dismissed petitioners’ ease for failing to comply with that…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Althen v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Veryzer v. Secretary of Health & Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- SIMANSKI v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Simanski ex rel. O.A.S. v. Secretary of Health & Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Debra Chuisano, as Legal Representative of the Estate of Frances D'esposito v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Simanski v. HhsUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.