Legal Opinion

Hotel Employees and Restaurant Employees International Union John Wilhelm Donald M. Taylor Mark D. Atkinson v. Nevada Gaming Commission

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 27, 1993No. 91-15188PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUG, Circuit Judge:

An international union and some of its employees contest the validity of certain Nevada gaming control statutes and regulations and their applicability to them. The State of Nevada has a comprehensive statutory system to control the gaming industry in the state. The statutes provide for a Gaming Commission (“Commission”) that is to adopt comprehensive regulations interpreting and applying the statutes and to perform adjudicatory functions in enforcing the gaming control statutes and regulations. The statutes also provide for a Gaming Control Board (“Board”), which is the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. Burford v. Sun Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  5. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. State Energy Resources Conservation & Development CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. ReadyLink Healthcare, Inc. v. State Compensation Insurance FundCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  2. Fireman's Fund Insurance Company, a California Corporation v. City of Lodi, California, Jack Sieglock, in His Capacity as Mayor of the City of Lodi Richard Prima, Jr., in His Capacity as Enforcing Officer of Lodi Ordinance No. 1650 Randall A. Hays, Individually and in His Capacity as Lodi City Attorney Michael C. Donovan, Individually and in His Capacity as Lodi Assistant City Attorney Adam L. Babich, Individually and in His Capacity as Lodi Assistant City Attorney Steven H. Doto, Individually and in His Capacity as Lodi Assistant City Attorney Bret A. Stone, Individually and in His Capacity as Lodi Assistant City Attorney John R. Till, Individually and in His Capacity as Lodi Assistant City Attorney Zevnik, Horton, Guibord and McGovern Llp, Individually and in Their Capacity as Lodi Assistant City Attorneys Fran E. Forkas, in His Capacity as Enforcing Officer of Lodi Ordinance No. 1650, Unigard Insurance Company, a Washington Corporation Unigard Security Insurance Company, a Washington Corporation v. City of LodiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  3. Walter Hoye, Ii v. City of OaklandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  4. Arizona Dream Act Coalition v. Janice BrewerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  5. United States v. Peter Morros, and State of Nevada R. Michael Turnipseed Nevada Agency for Nuclear ProjectsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API