Legal Opinion

Walter Hoye, Ii v. City of Oakland

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 28, 2011No. 09-16753PublishedCited by 96 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BERZON, Circuit Judge:

Throughout our nation’s history, Americans have counted on the First Amendment to protect their right to ask their fellow citizens to change their mind. Abolitionists, suffragists, socialists, pacifists, union members, war protestors, religious believers, civil rights campaigners, anti-tax activists, and countless others have appealed to the principle, enshrined within the First Amendment, that in a democracy such as ours, public debate must be robust and free and that, for it to be so, the Constitution’s protection of the freedom of speech must extend to the…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  4. Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  5. Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by96 opinions

  1. Pahls v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
  2. McCullen v. CoakleySupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  3. Syed Hassan v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015
  4. Nationwide Biweekly Administration, Inc. v. OwenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  5. Paul Isaacson v. Tom HorneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013

91 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API