Quinones v. Long Island Jewish Medical Center
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
The nature and degree of the sanction to be imposed on a motion pursuant to CPLR 3126 is within the broad discretion of the motion court (see Zletz v Wetanson, 67 NY2d 711, 713 [1986]; Pirro Group, LLC v One Point St., Inc., 71 AD3d 654, 655 [2010]; Novick v DeRosa, 51 AD3d 885 [2008]; Martin v City of New York, 46 AD3d 635 [2007]; Bomzer v Parke-Davis, Div. of Warner Lambert Co., 41 AD3d 522 [2007]). “The striking of a pleading may be appropriate where there is a clear showing that the failure to comply with discovery demands is willful and contumacious” (McArthur v New York City Hous.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Zletz v. WetansonNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Pirro Group, LLC v. One Point Street, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- McArthur v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Workman v. Town of SouthamptonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Bomzer v. Parke-DavisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Dokaj v. Ruxton Tower Ltd. PartnershipAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Montemurro v. Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Wolf v. FlowersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Corex-SPA v. Janel Group of New York, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Singer v. RiskinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.