Legal Opinion
Zletz v. Wetanson
New York Court of Appeals
Decided February 11, 1986PublishedCited by 112 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be modified, *713without costs, by reinstating the complaint as against defendants Wetanson, Civin and Epstein and, as so modified, affirmed.
In March 1983, approximately two years after commencing this action for breach of oral partnership agreements and conspiracy, plaintiff began a flurry of discovery by securing the depositions of defendants Epstein and Vilca and serving upon defendants a set of interrogatories and a notice to produce documents. After some 14 months of defendants’ unsuccessful efforts to secure…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Allen v. Crowell-Collier Publishing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1968
- Reynolds Securities, Inc. v. Underwriters Bank & Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Battaglia v. HofmeisterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Fellner v. Texas Mexican Railway Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- Commissioners of the State Insurance Fund v. News World Communications, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
3Cited by112 opinions
- Kihl v. PfefferNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
- Tewari v. TsoutsourasNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
- Frias v. FortiniAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Sawh v. BridgesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Henry Rosenfeld, Inc. v. Bower & GardnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
107 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.