Legal Opinion

Wagner v. Riske

Texas Supreme Court

Decided February 16, 1944No. 8203PublishedCited by 119 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Critz

As we gather from this record, W. A. Wagner first filed this suit against Emil Riske and wife, Liessette Riske, to recover judgment on a promissory note alleged to have been executed by Emil and Liessette Riske in the principal sum of $800.00, dated December 1, 1921, maturing December 1, 1922, bearing seven per cent, interest per annum, providing for ten per cent, attorney’s fees, and payable to plaintiff. During the pendency of the suit Emil Riske died, and plaintiff filed an amended pe- - tition against Liessette Riske, and Anita Riske Giese and her husband, Lester E. Giese. For convenience…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Galveston, H. & S. A. Ry. Co. v. Stewart & ThreadgillTexas Commission of Appeals · 1924
  2. McCutchen v. PurintonTexas Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Callaghan v. Estate of GrenetTexas Supreme Court · 1886
  4. San Antonio Water Works Co. v. Maury & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Wagner v. RiskeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1943

3Cited by119 opinions

  1. Cherne Industries, Inc. v. MagallanesTexas Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Las Vegas Pecan & Cattle Co. v. Zavala CountyTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Tenery v. TeneryTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Southwest Airlines Co. v. Texas High-Speed Rail AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1994
  5. Ad Villarai, LLC v. Chan Il PakTexas Supreme Court · 2017

114 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API