Legal Opinion

Tenery v. Tenery

Texas Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1996No. 96-0216PublishedCited by 116 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

In this divorce case, the trial court refused three requests to make findings of fact and conclusions of law about the division of a marital estate and the amount of child support. The court of appeals held that the trial court’s refusal was not harmful error. - S.W.2d -, -, 1995 WL 714203. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

The trial court awarded Gloria Tenery a disproportionate amount of the marital estate. It also ordered her husband, Wilbur, to pay $550 per month in child support for the care of one minor child. At the time of trial, Wilbur was collecting $980 per month in…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cherne Industries, Inc. v. MagallanesTexas Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Wagner v. RiskeTexas Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Murff v. MurffTexas Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Tenery v. TeneryCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1995

4Cited by116 opinions

  1. In the Interest of J.I.T.P., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2003
  2. Graham Central Station, Inc. v. Jesus PeñaTexas Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Ad Villarai, LLC v. Chan Il PakTexas Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Reiff v. Roy, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2003
  5. Puri v. Mansukhani, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1998

111 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API