Legal Opinion

McCutchen v. Purinton

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 13, 1892No. 7280PublishedCited by 36 opinions

Ho statement is necessary.

1Opinion of the Court

HENRY, Associate Justice.

— This was an action of trespass to try title, brought by appellees as heirs of Mrs. M. M. Purinton.

The agreed statement of facts upon which the cause was tried shows, that the land in controversy was acquired by M. M. Purinton on the 2d day of April, 1886, for a valuable consideration, being the sum of $1120; that said M. M. Purinton died on the 17th day of July, 1887, and that plaintiffs are her heirs; that defendant claims the land by virtue of a judgment obtained against W. W. Purinton on the lith day of November, 1885, and a valid sale under execution made on the…

2Cited by36 opinions

  1. Simonds v. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Kahn v. KahnTexas Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Wagner v. RiskeTexas Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Hodge v. EllisTexas Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Henry S. Miller Company v. EvansTexas Supreme Court · 1970

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API