Royston v. City of Charlotte
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWiest, J.
The city of Charlotte, in its public park, among playground equipment for children, provided a swing, constructed with timber posts set in concrete, notched at the tops to hold an iron crossbar about four inches in diameter and 16 feet in length, to which were attached, by chains, four swings. "While plaintiff’s decedent, a boy 11 years and 9 months of age, was using one of the swings a post broke off, the iron crossbar fell and fractured the boy’s skull and he died two days later. This case was brought to recover damages and defendant prosecutes review by appeal from a judgment in favor of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Heino v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1918
- Smith v. City of Iowa CitySupreme Court of Iowa · 1931
- Epstein v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
- Butler v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
- Brink v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Williams v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1961
- Hadfield v. Oakland County Drain CommissionerMichigan Supreme Court · 1988
- Rosario v. City of LansingMichigan Supreme Court · 1978
- Gerzeski v. Department of State HighwaysMichigan Supreme Court · 1978
- Buckeye Union Fire Insurance v. StateMichigan Supreme Court · 1970
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.