Legal Opinion

Bull v. City of Spokane

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 8, 1907No. 6609PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Spokane county, Huneke, J., entered July 3, 1906, dismissing an action for personal injuries sustained by a pedestrian in falling upon a sidewalk, after a trial on the merits before the court and a jury.

1Opinion of the CourtRoot, J.

This action was for damages arising from personal injuries sustained by appellant Sarah Agnes Bull in *238falling upon one of respondent’s sidewalks. From a judgment of dismissal on plaintiffs’ case, this appeal is taken.

It is urged by respondent that the evidence fails to show that said appellant fell upon the sidewalk, and that it also fails to show that the ice and snow, which are .claimed to.have been the cause of the fall, were in such condition as to constitute negligence on the part of the city. The evidence of said appellant herself is that she was upon the sidewalk at the time when she…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sutton v. City of SnohomishWashington Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Smith v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Calder v. City of Walla WallaWashington Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Piper v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Ziegler v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1901

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Amelchenko v. Borough of FreeholdSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1964
  2. Nichols v. Village of BuhlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
  3. Niebarger v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Wren v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Wilson v. City of ClintonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API