Legal Opinion

Niebarger v. City of Seattle

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 4, 1958No. 34708PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMallery, J.

This is an action for personal injuries sustained by the plaintiff when she fell oh an icy sidewalk in the city of Seattle. From an adverse judgment based on the jury’s verdict, the defendant appeals.

A heavy intermittent snowfall commenced on January 15th and continued to January 18, 1954. The sidewalk, which was level where the respondent fell, had become ridged and humped with ice and snow from pedestrian traffic. This constituted the dangerous condition relied upon by the respondent.

There is a city ordinance in Seattle which requires abutting property owners to clear snow and ice froin…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bull v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Holland v. City of AuburnWashington Supreme Court · 1931

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Amelchenko v. Borough of FreeholdSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1964
  2. The-Anh Nguyen v. City of SeattleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  3. Wright v. City of KennewickWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Wuthrich v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Laguna v. StateCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API