Humm v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
HARTNETT, Justice:
In this appeal, we hold that, under 18 Del.C. § 3902, the Delaware Uninsured and Underinsured Motor Vehicle Insurance Coverage Statute, an insurance carrier’s duty to provide a minimum level of uninsurance coverage under subsection (a) is separate and distinct from its duty, under subsection (b), to offer additional uninsured/underinsured coverage up to the amount of the basic liability policy. Consequently, the requirement for a written rejection of the coverage provided under subsection (a) is not applicable as to the additional uninsured/underinsured coverage described in…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Moore v. SizemoreSupreme Court of Delaware · 1979
- Giuricich v. Emtrol Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1982
- In Re the Adoption of SwansonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1993
- Frank v. Horizon Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1989
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. ArmsSupreme Court of Delaware · 1984
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. MundorfSupreme Court of Delaware · 1995
- Mason v. United Services Automobile Ass'nSupreme Court of Delaware · 1997
- Nelson v. Frank E. Best Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2000
- Evans v. PhelpsDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2010
- Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2000
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.