Legal Opinion

Humm v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided April 18, 1995No. 323, 1994PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARTNETT, Justice:

In this appeal, we hold that, under 18 Del.C. § 3902, the Delaware Uninsured and Underinsured Motor Vehicle Insurance Coverage Statute, an insurance carrier’s duty to provide a minimum level of uninsurance coverage under subsection (a) is separate and distinct from its duty, under subsection (b), to offer additional uninsured/underinsured coverage up to the amount of the basic liability policy. Consequently, the requirement for a written rejection of the coverage provided under subsection (a) is not applicable as to the additional uninsured/underinsured coverage described in…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Moore v. SizemoreSupreme Court of Delaware · 1979
  2. Giuricich v. Emtrol Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1982
  3. In Re the Adoption of SwansonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1993
  4. Frank v. Horizon Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1989
  5. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. ArmsSupreme Court of Delaware · 1984

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. MundorfSupreme Court of Delaware · 1995
  2. Mason v. United Services Automobile Ass'nSupreme Court of Delaware · 1997
  3. Nelson v. Frank E. Best Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2000
  4. Evans v. PhelpsDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2010
  5. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2000

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API