Legal Opinion

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Mundorf

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided June 5, 1995No. 495, 1994PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALSH, Justice:

In this appeal from the Superior Court, we consider the requirements of the Delaware Assigned Risk Plan (the “Plan”) with respect to the sending of notice of cancellation of a motor vehicle insurance policy by insurance companies to policyholders. Specifically, we hold that an insurer is required to send notice of cancellation where the assigned risk policy expires or lapses according to its terms by reason of the policyholder’s failure to pay the premium to renew coverage. We view the Plan’s explicit provisions as mandating such notice. Accordingly, we affirm the ruling of the…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Moore v. SizemoreSupreme Court of Delaware · 1979
  2. Giuricich v. Emtrol Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1982
  3. Teeter v. Allstate InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. ArmsSupreme Court of Delaware · 1984
  5. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co. v. KrongoldSupreme Court of Delaware · 1974

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Brzoska v. OlsonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1995
  2. State v. BarnesSupreme Court of Delaware · 2015
  3. Prunckun v. Delaware Dept. of Health & Social Services Oldham v. Delaware Dept. of Health & Social ServicesSupreme Court of Delaware · 2019
  4. Cantinca v. FontanaSupreme Court of Delaware · 2005
  5. King Construction, Inc. v. Plaza Four Realty, LLCSupreme Court of Delaware · 2009

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API